← All chapters

The Theory of Moral Sentiments · Chapter

Part III: Of the Foundation of Our Judgments Concerning Our Own Sentiments and Conduct, and of the Sense of Duty explained

This part examines how we judge our own sentiments and conduct by imagining how an impartial spectator would view them, introducing the concept of the impartial spectator as the basis for self-approbation and self-disapprobation, and explor

What happens

This part examines how we judge our own sentiments and conduct by imagining how an impartial spectator would view them, introducing the concept of the impartial spectator as the basis for self-approbation and self-disapprobation, and explores the sense of duty derived from general rules of morality.

Free preview opens on this chapter — companions, themes, and character notes appear beside the text.

Narrative arc

Story tension across the book — this chapter sits in Falling action.

SetupAftermathClimax
  • Setup
  • Escalation
  • Breaking point
  • Aftermath
  • Closing

This passage marks the dramatic climax because it crystallizes the core psychological crisis: the tension betw…

Full beat labels and climax notes unlock in the reader.

Follow the arc while reading

Themes in this chapter

Characters to notice

  • Epictetus

    Referenced in the context of Stoic philosophy and self-command.

  • Socrates

    Mentioned as an exemplar of moral reasoning and self-examination.

  • Seneca

    Cited in discussions of moral judgment and the role of the impartial spectator.

Key passages

  • “We suppose ourselves the spectators of our own behaviour, and endeavour to imagine what effect it would, in this light, produce upon us.”

    We imagine how an impartial observer would react to our actions and use that imagined reaction to judge ourselves.

    This introduces the core mechanism of self-judgment through the impartial spectator.

  • “The man who acts according to the rules of perfect prudence, of strict justice, and of proper benevolence, may be said to be perfectly virtuous.”

    A person who follows the rules of prudence, justice, and benevolence is considered fully virtuous.

    Smith defines virtue in terms of adherence to these moral rules.