← All chapters

The Federalist Papers · Chapter

XXXV: The Same Subject Continued (Concerning the General Power of Taxation) explained

Hamilton argues that restricting the national government's power of taxation to specific objects, such as duties on imports, would lead to oppression of certain industries, unequal tax distribution among states and citizens, and harmful eco

What happens

Hamilton argues that restricting the national government's power of taxation to specific objects, such as duties on imports, would lead to oppression of certain industries, unequal tax distribution among states and citizens, and harmful economic consequences. He contends that an indefinite power of taxation is necessary for fairness and efficiency, and that representatives, whether landholders, merchants, or professionals, will naturally understand and attend to the interests of all classes due to their own dependence on the people and the laws.

Free preview opens on this chapter — companions, themes, and character notes appear beside the text.

Narrative arc

Story tension across the book — this chapter sits in Exposition.

SetupEscalationClimax
  • Setup
  • Escalation
  • Breaking point
  • Aftermath
  • Closing

This is the story's dramatic climax because Hamilton directly confronts the most emotionally charged accusatio…

Full beat labels and climax notes unlock in the reader.

Follow the arc while reading

Themes in this chapter

Characters to notice

  • Publius

    Author of the essay, addressing the people of New York on the necessity of an indefinite power of taxation.

  • Alexander Hamilton

    Primary author of this Federalist Paper, presenting economic and political arguments for broad federal taxation.

  • Congress

    Implied as the national legislature that would exercise the power of taxation under the proposed Constitution.

  • The Senate

    Mentioned in the context of state legislatures, comparing representation of moderate proprietors.

Key passages

  • “If the jurisdiction of the national government, in the article of revenue, should be restricted to particular objects, it would naturally occasion an undue proportion of the public burdens to fall upon those objects.”

    Limiting federal taxing power to specific items would unfairly concentrate tax burdens on those items.

    Hamilton introduces the core argument against restricting federal revenue authority.

  • “Exorbitant duties on imported articles would beget a general spirit of smuggling; which is always prejudicial to the fair trader, and eventually to the revenue itself.”

    Very high import taxes would encourage widespread smuggling, harming honest merchants and reducing government income.

    Hamilton warns of unintended consequences of excessive import duties.

  • “The man who understands those principles best will be least likely to resort to oppressive expedients, or sacrifice any particular class of citizens to the procurement of revenue.”

    A tax expert is less likely to use harsh measures or unfairly target one group to raise money.

    Hamilton argues that knowledgeable representatives will design fairer tax systems.