← All chapters

The Federalist Papers · Chapter

LXXXIV: Certain General and Miscellaneous Objections to the Constitution Considered and Answered explained

Hamilton addresses remaining objections to the Constitution, focusing on the absence of a bill of rights, the expense of the new government, and the remoteness of the national government.

What happens

Hamilton addresses remaining objections to the Constitution, focusing on the absence of a bill of rights, the expense of the new government, and the remoteness of the national government. He argues that the Constitution itself contains numerous protections for liberty, such as habeas corpus and prohibitions on ex post facto laws, and that a bill of rights is unnecessary and potentially dangerous. He also contends that the new government will not be significantly more expensive than the current one and that concerns about distance are overstated.

Free preview opens on this chapter — companions, themes, and character notes appear beside the text.

Narrative arc

Story tension across the book — this chapter sits in Falling action.

SetupEscalationClimax
  • Setup
  • Escalation
  • Breaking point
  • Aftermath
  • Closing

This is the story's dramatic climax because Hamilton directly confronts the most emotionally charged accusatio…

Full beat labels and climax notes unlock in the reader.

Follow the arc while reading

Themes in this chapter

Characters to notice

  • Publius

    Author of the essay, addressing objections to the Constitution.

  • Alexander Hamilton

    Likely author of this Federalist Paper, arguing for ratification.

  • The Judicious Blackstone

    Quoted on the importance of habeas corpus and protection against arbitrary imprisonment.

  • Congress

    Current Congress under the Confederation is contrasted with the proposed Congress.

  • The Senate

    Mentioned in context of treaty and appointment powers.

Key passages

  • “The observations of the judicious Blackstone, in reference to the latter, are well worthy of recital: 'To bereave a man of life (says he), or by violence to confiscate his estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of despotism, as must at once'”

    Hamilton quotes Blackstone to emphasize that taking a person's life or property without trial is a blatant act of tyranny.

    Used to support the importance of habeas corpus and due process.

  • “What signifies a declaration, that 'the liberty of the press shall be inviolably preserved'? What is the liberty of the press? Who can give it any definition which would not leave the utmost latitude for evasion?”

    Hamilton questions the value of a mere declaration protecting press freedom, arguing it is too vague to be effective.

    Part of his argument against the need for a bill of rights.

  • “The truth is, after all the declamations we have heard, that the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, a bill of rights.”

    Hamilton asserts that the Constitution itself functions as a bill of rights by specifying the structure of government and protecting individual liberties.

    Central to his rebuttal of the objection that the Constitution lacks a bill of rights.