← All chapters

The Federalist Papers · Chapter

LXXVIII: The Judiciary Department explained

Hamilton argues for the independence of the judiciary, emphasizing life tenure during good behavior as essential to protect the Constitution and individual rights.

What happens

Hamilton argues for the independence of the judiciary, emphasizing life tenure during good behavior as essential to protect the Constitution and individual rights. He explains that courts must have the power to declare legislative acts void if they conflict with the Constitution, positioning the judiciary as an intermediate body between the people and the legislature. The judiciary is the weakest branch, with no influence over force or wealth, and requires firmness and permanency to resist encroachments from the other branches.

Free preview opens on this chapter — companions, themes, and character notes appear beside the text.

Narrative arc

Story tension across the book — this chapter sits in Rising action.

SetupEscalationClimax
  • Setup
  • Escalation
  • Breaking point
  • Aftermath
  • Closing

This is the story's dramatic climax because Hamilton directly confronts the most emotionally charged accusatio…

Full beat labels and climax notes unlock in the reader.

Follow the arc while reading

Themes in this chapter

Characters to notice

  • Publius

    Author of the essay, addressing the people of New York on the judiciary department.

  • Alexander Hamilton

    Primary author of Federalist No. 78, arguing for judicial independence and life tenure.

  • Congress

    Legislative body whose acts may be declared void by the judiciary if contrary to the Constitution.

  • The Judges

    Federal judges who hold office during good behavior, serving as guardians of the Constitution.

  • The Senate

    Part of the legislative branch; mentioned in context of checks on judicial appointments.

Key passages

  • “The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution.”

    Judicial independence is especially crucial in a government with a written constitution that limits legislative power.

    Hamilton argues that courts must be independent to enforce constitutional limits on the legislature.

  • “The judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.”

    The judicial branch is the least threatening to political rights because it has no control over the military or the treasury.

    Hamilton highlights the judiciary's weakness as a reason to protect its independence.

  • “It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority.”

    The courts serve as a mediator between the people and the legislature, ensuring that lawmakers do not exceed their constitutional powers.

    This passage articulates the concept of judicial review as a check on legislative authority.