← All themes

What Is to Be Done? · Theme

Rational Egoism

How What Is to Be Done? develops Rational Egoism.

Characters act according to enlightened self-interest, believing that truly understanding one's own needs leads to moral and beneficial actions for all, as seen in Lopukhov's calculated marriage and the cooperative workshop.

Where it surfaces

  • What Is to Be Done?

    The philosophical underpinning of the characters' decisions to act according to enlightened self-interest.

  • A Vital Question

    The chapter delves into the concept of rational egoism, where characters debate whether self-interest can align with moral and social progress.

  • Part II: First Love, and Legal Marriage

    Lopukhóf's arguments that acting in one's own rational self-interest can lead to ethical outcomes, as seen in his proposal to Vera.

  • II

    Lopukhóf's calculated renunciation of romantic follies and his focus on self-improvement and science reflect the principle of rational egoism.

  • VIII: The Temptation of Hamlet

    Central to the chapter: Lopukhóf argues that all human actions are driven by self-interest, and Viéra tests this theory in her personal dilemma.

  • IX

    Central to the chapter: Lopukhóf's concept of 'self-interest' is contrasted with Marya Alekséyevna's vulgar greed, and the narrator defends it against accusations of materialism and immorality.

  • XVII

    Lopukhóf's calculated use of alcohol to achieve his goal exemplifies rational self-interest, a key theme in the novel.

  • XIX

    Lopukhóf's internal monologue repeatedly asserts that he acts only for his own best good, rejecting the idea of sacrifice as a false term.

  • XVII

    Kirsánof explicitly frames his decision in terms of rational self-interest, weighing the costs and benefits of staying versus leaving.

  • XVIII

    Kirsánof's actions are explicitly framed as selfish pleasure derived from the skill of his maneuver, aligning with the theory that all actions are motivated by self-interest.

  • XXI

    Lopukhóf applies rational self-interest and materialist analysis to understand his wife's feelings and Kirsánov's actions, prioritizing Vera's happiness over his own emotional attachment.

  • A Theoretical Conversation

    Both characters analyze their own motives through the lens of rational egoism, noting how self-interest shapes their arguments and actions.

  • XXV

    Lopukhov argues that Vera's suffering is pointless and that true happiness comes from following one's genuine feelings, a core tenet of rational egoism.

  • XXVI

    Lopukhóf's calm, reasoned response to Vera's letter and his focus on practical affairs exemplify the rational egoist approach to emotional crises.

  • II

    Vera discusses Lopukhov's and Kirsanov's tendency to explain their actions through egotistical calculation, a central theme in the chapter.

  • XVII

    Katerina and Beaumont act according to their own convenience and mutual respect, free from the 'devils' of passion or social pressure.