Justice and Innocence

The wrongful accusation of Harborough for Kitely's murder raises questions about legal justice versus actual innocence, with the barrister Brereton working to prove Harborough's innocence against circumstantial evidence.

Brereton's argument that the evidence is too obvious indicates a concern for true justice versus circumstantial guilt.

Harborough's insistence on his innocence and the tension between legal presumption of innocence and circumstantial evidence.

Harborough's refusal to provide an alibi and his insistence that the truth will come out highlight the tension between legal procedure and actual innocence.

Brereton works to prove Harborough's innocence while exploring alternative suspects.