← All chapters

Short Fiction · Chapter

Clovis on Parental Responsibilities explained

Clovis engages in a conversation with Mrs.

What happens

Clovis engages in a conversation with Mrs. Eggelby, who is obsessed with praising her children's perfections. Clovis, unimpressed, challenges her views on parenting, card games, and the triviality of remembering important versus unimportant facts, leading to a frosty departure.

Free preview opens on this chapter — companions, themes, and character notes appear beside the text.

Narrative arc

Story tension across the book — this chapter sits in Falling action.

SetupEscalationAftermathClimax
  • Setup
  • Escalation
  • Breaking point
  • Aftermath
  • Closing

This excerpt is the story's dramatic climax because it presents the emotional and psychological peak of Egbert…

Full beat labels and climax notes unlock in the reader.

Follow the arc while reading

Themes in this chapter

  • Hypocrisy and Moral Facade

    Mrs. Eggelby's exaggerated praise of her children contrasts with Clovis's cynical exposure of the flaws in her parenting philosophy.

  • The Absurdity of Social Rituals

    The conversation satirizes the social ritual of parental boasting and the arbitrary importance placed on trivial facts.

Characters to notice

  • Clovis Sangrail

    Engages in a witty and provocative dialogue with Mrs. Eggelby, challenging her parental pride and social conventions.

  • Reginald

    Mentioned indirectly as Clovis's cousin, Editha Clubberley, but not present; Reginald is a canonical character but not in this chapter.

Key passages

  • “You would like Eric, I feel sure you would like Eric. Everyone takes to him at once. You know, he always reminds me of that famous picture of the youthful David—I forget who it’s by, but it’s very well known.”

    Mrs. Eggelby insists that Clovis would admire her son Eric, comparing him to a well-known painting of the young David.

    Highlights Mrs. Eggelby's blind pride and Clovis's immediate dismissal of the comparison.

  • “Now, my mother never bothered about bringing me up. She just saw to it that I got whacked at decent intervals and was taught the difference between right and wrong; there is some difference, you know, but I’ve forgotten what it is.”

    Clovis claims his mother only ensured he was occasionally punished and taught right from wrong, but he has since forgotten the distinction.

    Illustrates Clovis's irreverent attitude toward conventional parenting and moral absolutes.