← All themes

Resurrection · Theme

Social Class and Inequality

How Resurrection develops Social Class and Inequality.

Tolstoy contrasts the luxurious, idle lives of the aristocracy (Nekhlúdoff, the Korchágins) with the suffering and degradation of the poor, prisoners, and peasants, showing how social structures perpetuate exploitation and moral blindness.

Where it surfaces

  • Resurrection

    The power imbalance between Nekhlúdoff, a wealthy prince, and Máslova, a former serf, highlights the theme of social class and inequality.

  • I

    The contrast between the natural beauty of spring and the artificial, cruel world of men, where the poor are imprisoned and judged while the wealthy remain free, underscores class divisions.

  • II

    The contrast between Katúsha's lowly birth and the wealthy landowners (the maiden ladies and Nekhlúdoff) illustrates the rigid class hierarchy that determines her fate.

  • IV

    Nekhlúdoff's reflections on Missy's 'good breeding' and his awareness of class distinctions highlight the theme of social class and inequality.

  • V

    Nekhlúdoff's sense of superiority and his irritation at Peter Gerasimovitch's familiarity highlight class distinctions and social hierarchies within the jury room.

  • IX

    Maslova's status as an illegitimate meschánka and her past as a servant contrast with Nekhludoff's aristocratic position, underscoring the class divide that enables his exploitation.

  • Chapter XIII

    The chapter contrasts Nekhlúdoff's privileged, idle life as a wealthy Guards officer with the peasants who receive his land but are judged as becoming poorer, highlighting class hypocrisy.

  • XVIII

    Nekhlúdoff's treatment of Katúsha reflects the power imbalance between a nobleman and a peasant girl.

  • Chapter XXIII

    Máslova's low social status as a former servant and prisoner makes her vulnerable to a hasty and unjust verdict, while the jury's weariness and biases override her innocence.

  • The Sentence

    Maslova's powerless position as a peasant woman is contrasted with the president's casual dismissal of her fate, reflecting class-based disparities in justice.

  • XXVI

    Nekhlúdoff's discomfort with the Korchágins' opulent lifestyle contrasts with the suffering of prisoners like Máslova.

  • Chapter XXVII

    Nekhlúdoff's discomfort highlights the vast gulf between the privileged elite and the suffering he witnessed in court.

  • XXVIII

    Nekhlúdoff's guilt over his wealth and privilege contrasts with Maslova's suffering as a prisoner.

  • Chapter XXX: The Women's Cell

    The diverse backgrounds of the prisoners—from peasants to a deacon's daughter—illustrate how class and poverty lead to incarceration and unequal treatment.

  • XXXI

    The prisoners discuss how lack of money leads to harsh sentences, contrasting with the wealthy who can hire skilled lawyers.

  • XXXII

    The 'aristocracy' of the cell—those with money—share resources, while the red-haired woman's desperation for vodka underscores class divisions even among prisoners.

  • XXXIII

    Nekhlúdoff's decision to give up his house and servants reflects his rejection of aristocratic privilege and his recognition of class-based injustice.

  • Chapter XXXIV

    The contrast between the comfortable judges and the destitute boy highlights class-based injustice.

  • XXXVII

    The contrast between Nekhlúdoff's comfortable life in a first-class carriage and Máslova's desperate run in the mud and rain underscores class divisions.

  • XLV

    Nekhlúdoff's wealth and connections contrast with the dejected clients in Fanárin's waiting room, and the advocate's casual dismissal of the merchant's greed.

  • XLVI

    The contrast between the prisoners' suffering and the authorities' power underscores class divisions, with Vasíliev's education and firmness making him a target.

  • XLVIII

    Máslova's angry reminder of their class difference—'I am a convict, and you a prince'—underscores the insurmountable social divide.

  • L

    Nekhlúdoff's ability to obtain special permissions through his aristocratic connections contrasts with the powerlessness of common prisoners like Máslova and the Menshóffs.

  • LI

    The contrast between the inspector's comfortable home life and the squalid prison conditions underscores class divides.

  • LII

    The peasant Menshóff is powerless against the public-house keeper, who uses wealth to manipulate the system, highlighting class-based injustice.

  • LIII

    The contrast between Nekhlúdoff's freedom and the prisoners' helplessness, and the continued use of corporal punishment for those 'deprived of rights,' underscores class-based injustice.

  • LVII

    Nekhlúdoff's discomfort at the social gathering contrasts with the frivolity of the upper class, while he seeks justice for the poor and imprisoned.

  • II

    The contrast between Nekhlúdoff and the peasants—their thin faces, rough coats, and the steward's overfed appearance—underscores class divisions.

  • IV

    Nekhlúdoff's walk through the village starkly contrasts his clean, well-dressed appearance with the peasants' bare feet, dirty clothes, and meager living conditions, highlighting the vast social divide.

  • V

    Nekhlúdoff's conversation with the boys reveals the extreme poverty of families like Martha's, directly caused by his own land ownership and the imprisonment of her husband for cutting trees.

  • VI

    The stark contrast between Nekhlúdoff's wealth and the peasants' destitution is highlighted through his encounters with beggars and the dispute over the cows.

  • VII

    The communication gap between Nekhlúdoff and the peasants illustrates the vast social divide, where even a generous offer is interpreted as a cunning trick due to class-based suspicion.

  • VIII

    Contrast between the suffering of the poor (woman with children, dying baby) and the lavish life of the rich.

  • Nekhlúdoff's Return to Town

    Nekhlúdoff contrasts the well-fed townspeople with the impoverished peasants he has just seen, highlighting the deep class divide.

  • XII

    Nekhlúdoff contrasts the luxury of the new palace with the suffering of the peasant workers, highlighting the vast divide between the rich and the poor.

  • XIV

    Nekhlúdoff's argument with his aunt about the peasants' suffering versus aristocratic luxury highlights the deep class divisions and economic injustice in Russian society.

  • XV

    Nekhlúdoff's discomfort in aristocratic circles and the contrast between the luxurious lives of the elite and the suffering of prisoners underscore class divisions.

  • Chapter XVI

    The Petersburg elite's casual discussion of Kámenski's duel contrasts with the indifference to the fates of common prisoners like Máslova.

  • XVII

    The dinner party's luxury and the sermon's audience of wealthy elites highlight the vast class divide.

  • Chapter XVIII

    Nekhlúdoff contrasts the clean, well-fed officials with the prisoners and peasants, reflecting the vast social divide in Russian society.

  • Chapter XXIII

    Selenin's compromises are driven by the pressures of his aristocratic social class and the expectations of his family and peers, which trap him in a life he finds meaningless.

  • XXIV

    The advocate's stories of high-placed criminals avoiding punishment underscore the class-based nature of justice.

  • Nekhlúdoff's Classification of Prisoners and His Search for Justice

    The fifth class of prisoners are those sinned against by society, such as Okhótin and Fédoroff, whose backgrounds reflect class-based oppression.

  • XXXI

    Nathalie's horror at her brother marrying a convict woman highlights class prejudices, while the land reform debate underscores economic inequality.

  • XXXIII

    Nekhlúdoff claims the law is an instrument for upholding the existing order beneficial to the upper class.

  • XXXV

    The stark contrast between the dehumanized prisoners and the wealthy family in the carriage highlights the deep class divisions in Russian society.

  • XXXVI

    Nekhlúdoff's ability to hire a carriage and buy refreshments contrasts sharply with the convicts' deprivation, and the crowd's comments reflect awareness of the unequal treatment of prisoners.

  • XXXVII

    The contrast between the value placed on a horse (the bay stallion) and the indifference toward the dead convicts underscores the dehumanization of the lower classes.

  • Chapter XXXVIII

    Nekhlúdoff's ability to bribe the sergeant to speak with prisoners contrasts with the powerlessness of the convicts.

  • Chapter XXXIX

    The contrast between the Korchágins' luxurious first-class travel and Nekhlúdoff's choice of third-class carriage underscores the theme of class division. Nekhlúdoff's decision to travel with Tarás reflects his growing identification with the lower classes.

  • XLII

    The contrast between the wealthy Korchágins and the exhausted workmen highlights the vast social and economic divide in Russian society.

  • I

    The contrast between the treatment of criminal convicts and political prisoners highlights class and status divisions within the penal system.

  • IX

    Nekhlúdoff's privileged position contrasts sharply with the suffering and degradation of the prisoners, highlighting class divisions.

  • XI

    The stark contrast between Nekhlúdoff's privileged background and the prisoners' harsh living conditions highlights class disparities.

  • XII

    The chapter contrasts the peasant Nabátoff and the factory worker Kondrátieff, showing how class background shapes their revolutionary ideals and personal attitudes.

  • XIV

    Máslova and Nabátoff emphasize that the common people are dreadfully wronged, highlighting class injustice.

  • XIX

    The chapter highlights how officials and lawyers profit from the suffering of the lower classes, while the poor are systematically degraded.

  • XXII

    The General's high position allows him to be a 'little Tsar' and accept bribery, while lower officials are forced to take bribes due to poverty.

  • XXIV

    Nekhlúdoff's enjoyment of the General's luxury contrasts sharply with the prison conditions and Máslova's suffering, highlighting class divides.