What Is Property?
Translated by Benjamin Tucker
Free public-domain edition — preview in your browser, no account required for the first chapter.
Preview free · sign up to save progress, download to your shelf, and sync with the apps
Already have an account? Sign in
This foundational anarchist text offers a powerful, still-relevant critique of economic inequality and the legal structures that uphold it, challenging readers to rethink ownership and justice.
Edition details
Book Summary
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's 'What Is Property?' launches a radical critique of private property, famously declaring it theft. Through philosophical, legal, and economic analysis, he argues that property enables exploitation and inequality, advocating instead for a society based on possession, equality, and mutual justice.
The book begins with Proudhon's biographical context and his central inquiry into property's legitimacy. He systematically dismantles justifications for property—natural right, occupation, labor, and civil law—arguing each leads to equality and thus negates property itself. Distinguishing property (absolute, exploitative) from possession (temporary, use-based), he shows how property enables the idle to extract value from workers' labor, violating justice. Proudhon critiques communism as oppressive and property as despotic, proposing a synthesis: liberty, which balances equality, law, and individual autonomy. The Second Memoir defends his attack on the institution, not individuals, and identifies causes of social inequality. Throughout, he calls for a fundamental social revolution to replace property-based systems with associations grounded in equality and mutual aid.
Reading guide
Go deeper in What Is Property?
Character guides, themes, chapter companions — plus Character Web, narrative arc, and theme heatmap teasers that unlock fully beside the text in BetterReads.
Narrative arc
Story tension across the book.
Pierre Joseph Proudhon
Proudhon writes as a man of conviction who thinks only of his idea and his interlocutor, ad rem et ad hominem, and who asks to be judged by his arguments rather than his name. He anticipates history by a few days, calling his proposition the lightning-rod that might shield society from the coming thunderbolt, even as he insists he is no firebrand of sedition. His refusal to be intimidated by universal consent — appealing from the opinion of the human race to its faith — sets the terms for every debate that follows.
Charles Fourier
Fourier belongs to the circle of philosophers Proudhon questions in turn — spiritualist, materialist, eclectic — before turning to law. His doctrines of association represent one of the rival answers to the property question that Proudhon must clear away to make room for his own. The critique of Fourier matters because it shows that even the most radical reformers of the age left the core institution untouched.
M. Troplong
Troplong stands among the legal authorities whose views on property Proudhon debates, treating their doctrines as serious arguments rather than straw men. Where Pothier thinks property, like royalty, exists by divine right, Troplong supplies the civil-law scaffolding that Proudhon must dismantle. His presence in the argument shows how deeply the case for property is woven into jurisprudence, not merely philosophy.
Lamennais
Priest and political writer referenced in discussions of property and justice.
M. Wolowski
Wolowski belongs to the class of critics who answer Proudhon's paradox with the sober language of economics, and his objections sharpen the book's central quarrel. He represents the respectable opinion that property is a civil right born of occupation and sanctioned by law, exactly the position Proudhon means to overturn. His pushback forces the reader to weigh the argument rather than simply recoil from the slogan.
Destutt de Tracy
Philosopher and economist whose ideas on property are examined.
Property as Theft
The central thesis of the book, arguing that property (as distinct from possession) is fundamentally robbery, as it allows the idle to extract value from the labor of others and violates natural equality.
Equality and Justice
A recurring theme that true justice requires equality of conditions, and that property creates unjust inequality by privileging some over others through occupation, labor, or law.
Labor and Exploitation
Explores how labor is the source of all value, yet property enables the exploitation of workers by allowing proprietors to claim the fruits of others' labor without contributing equally.
Critique of Law and Government
Argues that civil law and government are tools that sanctify property and oppression, rather than protect natural rights, and that true society requires the abolition of man's rule over man.