← All chapters

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus · Chapter

6.1223 explained

Wittgenstein explains why logical truths seem to require postulation: they can be postulated only insofar as we can postulate an adequate notation.

What happens

Wittgenstein explains why logical truths seem to require postulation: they can be postulated only insofar as we can postulate an adequate notation.

Free preview opens on this chapter — companions, themes, and character notes appear beside the text.

Narrative arc

Story tension across the book.

SetupAftermathClimax
  • Setup
  • Escalation
  • Breaking point
  • Aftermath
  • Closing

This passage marks the story’s dramatic climax because it presents the moment when the protagonist’s obsessive…

Full beat labels and climax notes unlock in the reader.

Follow the arc while reading

Themes in this chapter

  • Logic and Tautology

    Logical truths are tautologies that require only an adequate notation, not substantive postulation.

Characters to notice

  • Mr. Wittgenstein

    Author of the Tractatus; explains the nature of logical truths and notation.

Key passages

  • “It now becomes clear why we often feel as though “logical truths” must be “ postulated ” by us. We can in fact postulate them in so far as we can postulate an adequate notation.”

    We now see why logical truths seem to need our stipulation: they can be stipulated only to the extent that we can stipulate a proper symbolic system.

    Wittgenstein clarifies that the apparent need to postulate logical truths reduces to the need for a suitable notation.