Revenge and Justice

Drummond's pursuit of Peterson is framed as a personal duel for justice, while Robinson's elaborate scheme is driven by a twenty-year thirst for revenge, suggesting that justice is often indistinguishable from vengeance.

Robinson's personal vendetta against Drummond takes precedence over practical concerns, as he insists on keeping him alive to savor his revenge.

Robinson's entire scheme is driven by a twenty-year desire for revenge against Peterson, which he considers an 'artistic revenge'.

Robinson's personal vendetta against Drummond drives his decisions, promising Freyder a chance to harm him and reserving the final blow for himself.

Drummond seeks a personal form of justice, wanting a final duel that appeals to his sense of fair play. He also threatens Blantyre with legal consequences, showing a dual path of revenge and formal justice.