Kant

Schopenhauer

Schopenhauer built upon and fiercely criticized Kant's transcendental idealism, rejecting his categorical imperative as a disguised Christian morality.

the Germans

Kant's moral philosophy, with its categorical imperative, is seen by Nietzsche as a sophisticated form of Christian slave morality that weakens the Germans.

Chapter 3

Referenced indirectly through Nietzsche's contrast of his own 'categorical imperative' with Kant's, highlighting his opposition to Kantian morality.

Chapter 5

Listed among those who dismissed pity as worthless.

Second Essay: “Guilt,” “Bad Conscience,” and the Like

Mentioned in the context of the categorical imperative and the concept of duty.

Chapter 6: The Cradle of Guilt and the Festive Nature of Cruelty

Mentioned in connection with the categorical imperative, which Nietzsche claims 'reeks of cruelty.'

Third Essay: What Is the Meaning of Ascetic Ideals?

Referenced for his concept of the 'thing-in-itself' and the ascetic character of his moral philosophy.

Chapter 6: Schopenhauer, Kant, and the Aesthetic Problem

Kant's definition of the beautiful as 'that which pleases without interesting' is contrasted with Stendhal's view; Nietzsche suggests Kant's perspective is that of a spectator, not an artist.

Chapter 7

Listed among unmarried philosophers who exemplify the ascetic ideal.

The Ascetic Ideal and the Will to Truth

Nietzsche references Kant's concept of the 'intelligible character of things' as an example of the ascetic schism that turns reason against itself, where the intellect acknowledges its own incomprehension.

Chapter 25: Science and the Ascetic Ideal

Mentioned for his confession about astronomy's humiliating effect and for his victory over theological dogmatism, which Nietzsche argues did not damage the ascetic ideal.