Table-Talk · Theme
Criticism and Critical Practice
How Table-Talk develops Criticism and Critical Practice.
The text critiques contemporary literary and artistic criticism, contrasting shallow, rule-based analysis with genuine criticism that captures the soul and passion of a work, and laments the rise of sensationalist, dogmatic reviewing.
Where it surfaces
- On the Pleasure of Painting
Hazlitt critiques Sir Joshua Reynolds's theory of art, arguing for the inclusion of individual details over mere general effect.
- The Same Subject Continued
The chapter is a sustained critical argument about the nature of artistic appreciation, contrasting the amateur's view with the connoisseur's or artist's deeper understanding.
- On Genius and Common Sense
The essay examines how criticism should be grounded in feeling and imagination, not abstract rules, and uses examples from art and physiognomy.
- The Same Subject Continued
Hazlitt defends the essay form as a legitimate mode of criticism, consisting of 'additions and corrections' to common knowledge, and rejects the demand for systematic regularity.
- Character of Cobbett
The chapter is a sustained critical analysis of Cobbett's character and writing style, comparing him to Paine, Burke, and others, and evaluating his methods and effectiveness.
- On the Ignorance of the Learned
Hazlitt critiques the learned for their reliance on authority and tradition rather than direct observation and reason.
- On Living to One’s-Self
Hazlitt critiques the cruelty and superficiality of contemporary criticism, where every petty caviller becomes a judge and authors are hounded.
- On Certain Inconsistencies in Sir Joshua Reynolds's Discourses
The chapter is a direct critical analysis of Reynolds's Discourses, exposing contradictions and questioning his authority.
- The Same Subject Continued
Hazlitt engages in a detailed critical analysis of Reynolds's Discourses, pointing out logical inconsistencies and challenging the theoretical foundations of Reynolds's aesthetic system.
- On Paradox and Commonplace
Hazlitt applies critical reasoning to dissect both Canning's commonplace and Shelley's paradoxes, exposing their underlying absurdities.
- On Vulgarity and Affectation
Hazlitt defends his own critical method against accusations of vulgarity, arguing that judgment should be based on intrinsic qualities, not fashion or location.
- On a Landscape of Nicolas Poussin
Hazlitt engages in detailed art criticism, comparing Poussin to Rubens and Raphael, and critiquing contemporary painters who mistake lack of expression for sublimity.
- On Milton's Sonnets
The chapter is a sustained critical comparison of Milton's sonnets with those of Shakespeare, Sydney, Warton, and Wordsworth, evaluating their sincerity and personal character.
- On the Aristocracy of Letters
Hazlitt engages in critical analysis of literary figures like Lord Byron and the unnamed 'aristocracy of letters,' questioning the basis of their acclaim.
- On Criticism
Hazlitt examines the evolution of criticism from simple opinion-giving to self-aggrandizing analysis, and contrasts genuine criticism with formalist or partisan approaches.
- On Familiar Style
Hazlitt critiques the styles of Dr. Johnson and others, advocating for a precise, natural style and evaluating the merits of familiar versus florid writing.
- On Effeminacy of Character
Hazlitt critiques the effeminate style of writers who are overly concerned with critical reception and alter their work to avoid offense.
- On Corporate Bodies
Hazlitt employs sharp social criticism to expose the hypocrisy and stagnation of institutions like universities and the Royal Academy.
- Whether Actors Ought to Sit in the Boxes?
Hazlitt positions the pit as the true place for critics and amateurs, contrasting it with the boxes where ignorance prevails.
- On Patronage and Puffing
Hazlitt reflects on the role of critics in shaping public opinion, including his own experiences writing critical verdicts and the limits of press influence on actors.
- On the Picturesque and Ideal
The chapter is a critical analysis of artistic categories, comparing painters and their techniques to define the picturesque and ideal.
- Endnotes
The endnotes include critiques of actors, artists, and writers, reflecting on the nature of critical judgment.