← All themes

Now It Can Be Told · Theme

Propaganda and Deception

How Now It Can Be Told develops Propaganda and Deception.

The book criticizes the manipulation of public opinion through false patriotism, censored news, and government lies, which sent men to die for hidden political and economic interests.

Where it surfaces

  • Now It Can Be Told

    The chapter critiques how official accounts and propaganda masked the true horrors of war, deceiving the public and soldiers alike.

  • Part I: Observers and Commanders

    The narrator criticizes the 'cheery' war articles, bishops praising God as commander-in-chief, and the callous optimism of noncombatants, contrasting with the grim reality seen by correspondents.

  • I

    The War Office's hostility to the press and the initial public perception of war as a 'glorious adventure' contrast sharply with the grim reality, revealing the gap between official narratives and truth.

  • II

    The High Command's desire to 'write up' the glorious side of war while suppressing the grim realities, and the public's demand for truthful news.

  • III

    The tension between G.H.Q. and the correspondents over censorship illustrates how information was controlled and manipulated to shape public perception.

  • VII

    Censors cut out key details, modified facts, and removed honors due to soldiers, reflecting the manipulation of war news.

  • IX

    The correspondents navigate censorship and Haig's initial view of their work as mere 'bright stories' for the public, while they see themselves as a spiritual force and chroniclers of truth.

  • X

    G.H.Q. is portrayed as a 'City of Beautiful Nonsense' where the pageantry of war masks the grim reality of the front.

  • XIV

    The narrator condemns the cheerful war propaganda and the callousness of those who speak of war as a sport or heroic game, masking the true suffering.

  • The New Army

    The chapter criticizes the use of misleading posters and censored communiqués that hid the true horrors of war from the public, manipulating them into enlisting.

  • IV

    The narrator notes that patriotism as a word meant nothing to the men, contrasting with official narratives of imperial glory.

  • VII

    The initial peaceful appearance of Ypres before the gas attack contrasts with the subsequent devastation, highlighting the deceptive nature of war's calm moments.

  • X

    Bayonet lectures use stories and rhetoric to dehumanize the enemy and incite bloodlust, conditioning soldiers to kill without mercy.

  • Part III: The Nature of a Battle

    The chapter highlights the disconnect between official reports (e.g., Sir John French's account) and the brutal truth on the ground, where 'holding attacks' served strategic purposes but resulted in a 'bloody shambles.'

  • I

    The High Command concealed its objectives and minimized their importance when hopes were unfulfilled, illustrating official deception.

  • VII

    Men are told the gas will kill the enemy, but it instead kills their own, highlighting the deception and miscalculation of military leadership.

  • VIII

    The German officer's hidden telephone directing fire on his own position illustrates the deception and sacrifice inherent in war.

  • XI

    The narrator initially dismisses the German officer's claim of readiness for two more winters as 'idiotic,' but later realizes his own foolish faith in a quick end.

  • XII

    False news of a French breakthrough spreads hope, while the reality is failure and death.

  • XIV

    Enemy losses were exaggerated to balance the 'Debit and Credit of war’s bookkeeping,' and leaders were lured by a false belief in German weakness.

  • VII

    The Canadians' deliberate use of propaganda to shape public perception, buying up artists and writers, and their determination that 'what Canada did the world should know'.

  • XII

    The correspondents and censors discuss false optimism and bluster, revealing how information about the war is filtered and contested.

  • The Great Push and the Tragedy of Sanctuary Wood

    Intelligence reports claim the enemy's reserves are thin, yet the German attack at Sanctuary Wood contradicts this optimism.

  • The Heart of a City

    Censors know no blue pencil can hide the truth of the retreat; war correspondents hate writing the truth; French news-sheets print only romanticized articles.

  • The Street of the Three Pebbles

    Mademoiselle Carpentier is trusted with military secrets by French and English officers, yet she exercises discretion, highlighting the informal networks of information and loyalty.

  • V

    The dehumanization of the enemy is evident as the women and soldiers mock the German officer's lover and celebrate his death with laughter.

  • VII

    The narrator's work as a war correspondent involves shaping the public's perception of the war, while the girls' enticements offer a deceptive escape from reality.

  • IX

    The English officers are accused of using a facade of seriousness and shyness to deceive French women, contrasting with their actual flirtatious behavior.

  • XII

    Officers sarcastically reference The Daily Mail's justification of the war, questioning the sincerity of patriotic narratives.

  • Part VI: Psychology on the Somme

    German officers forced soldiers to sing patriotic songs to boost morale, but the songs broke down.

  • II

    The troops are unaware of the true scale of the enemy's defenses, suggesting a gap between official narratives and reality.

  • IV

    The officers' belief in a quick breakthrough and the cavalry riding 'into the blue' reflects the optimistic but misleading propaganda about the upcoming offensive.

  • VII

    The early reports of victory contrast with the tragic disaster on the left, highlighting the deceptive nature of war narratives.

  • XI

    Censorship forced vague descriptions of tanks, creating a sensational but imprecise public image; the secret was given away prematurely due to poor generalship.

  • XII

    The chapter criticizes the dishonesty in official loss reports, noting that the British public was hoodwinked about the true number of destroyed machines and dead pilots.

  • XIX

    The narrator reflects on the men's faith in 'some kind of victory' despite the brutal reality, suggesting a disconnect between perception and truth.

  • XXI

    Forced singing and attempts to hide the true extent of losses from the German public and soldiers reveal the role of propaganda and deception.

  • XXIII

    The chapter contrasts the reality of war with the 'glory' and 'splendor' promoted by German philosophers and British Jingoes, and notes that soldiers' letters never reached home.

  • Part VII: The Fields of Armageddon

    The German waiter's remark that the war was a 'Great Swindle' reflects the disillusionment with wartime propaganda and leadership.

  • I

    Ludendorff's false promises to the German people and the dope of false hopes are highlighted as contributing to eventual revolt.

  • The Devastated Region

    Ludendorff's portrayal of the retreat as a 'brilliant performance' contrasts with the reality of devastation and human misery.

  • III

    French officers were supremely confident of success before the Nivelle Offensive, but it ended in disaster; the 'secret' was known by all.

  • IV

    The British secretly continued mining operations after the Germans believed they had abandoned them, using deception to gain advantage.

  • The German Offensive of 1918

    The narrator notes that war correspondents wrote the truth but were not believed by the public or politicians, and that deeper horrors and criticisms were censored.

  • IX

    Ludendorff's writings and the German soldiers' realization of the 'Great Swindle' reveal the deceptive narratives of war leaders.

  • Part VIII: For What Men Died

    The narrator critiques the false narratives of liberty and the gap between official rhetoric and reality.

  • I

    The author critiques the role of propaganda in shaping public opinion, including atrocity stories, spy-mania, and the suppression of truth, both at home and among the enemy.

  • II

    Leaders used high-sounding watchwords like liberty, justice, and honor to justify the war and manipulate public passion.

  • III

    Critiques the belief that the war was 'a war to end war,' noting that soldiers were duped into thinking their sacrifice would abolish militarism.

  • What of England?

    Highlights the initial idealism of young soldiers who believed they were fighting for liberty and to end war, contrasted with the reality of harsh discipline and doubts about the war's true purpose.

  • V

    Soldiers scorn the deliberate falsification of news and the breezy optimism of public figures, which they see as propaganda masking the war's horror.

  • VI

    Wilson's ideals of open covenants and self-determination are mocked by the closed doors of the peace conference and the harsh terms.

  • VIII

    Generals demanded a gospel of hate, not love, and the army cultivated bloodlust through psychological manipulation.