Dialogues · Concept
Knowledge and Ignorance
The text contrasts true knowledge (episteme) with mere opinion or ignorance, using allegories like the cave and the ship of state to illustrate the philosopher's pursuit of truth and the public's misunderstanding of it.
The text contrasts true knowledge (episteme) with mere opinion or ignorance, using allegories like the cave and the ship of state to illustrate the philosopher's pursuit of truth and the public's misunderstanding of it.
The preface grapples with the problem of authenticating Plato's writings, highlighting the tension between scholarly knowledge and uncertainty about the Platonic corpus.
The preface examines the authenticity of the Epistles, highlighting historical inaccuracies and plagiarisms that reveal ignorance or forgery.
The search for a definition of temperance reveals the limits of knowledge and the importance of self-knowledge, a key Socratic theme.
The central puzzle: can temperance be a 'science of science' that knows both what it knows and what it does not know? Socrates exposes the paradox of knowing what one does not know.